When I was in high school and still harbouring goals of one day becoming a spy, I made up this code revolving around the first twenty-six digits of pi (which I conveniently had memorised) and the Fibonacci sequence. I figured, the more esoteric and nonsensical, the better, so that if I ever needed to send a message to my future self I could rest assured knowing that no one except me would ever [want to] decipher it. This code was evidentally created when I believed in the idea of security through obscurity, and also when I knew next to nothing about cryptography except that you could encrypt stuff and then, like, decrypt it and stuff; also, public keys. (The latter still holds true.)
So here’s the idea. First, write out the first 26 digits of pi:
Then, underneath each digit, write out the number of times that digit will have appeared thus far:
Now, it’s pretty clear what we can do - assign each letter of the alphabet to a sequence of two letters. Pretty simple, but perhaps too simple. Now let’s make it a bit tricker with Fibonacci. If we write it as a sequence without spaces, it looks like this:
We can then add that sequence to the ciphertext, resulting in an added layer of confusion and rendering frequency-based analysis almost useless. And there you go.
Encoding and decoding a sequence
So let’s say you wanted to encode the following sequence:
lol mudkips lol
First, let’s revisit our alphabet:
So we have L = 81, O = 93, M = 92, U = 62, D = 12, K = 53, I = 52, P = 33, S = 82 and that’s all we need. This monoalphabetic substitution looks like this:
819381 92621253523382 819381
The spaces don’t look so good. So let’s disguise them by replacing them with 0’s. You could also replace them with any sequence of digits beginning and ending with a 0, which would result in some junk characters, but would also helps to ensure that you correctly decoded a message and nothing got lost, because you if you have an odd number of spaces then something is wrong. You could alternatively use any sequence of two digits starting with 0, or even something else entirely, but 0 is a good bet because it happens to not appear in the first 26 digits of pi. (It appears around digit #33, incidentally.) In this version, we’ll keep it simple by replacing spaces with 0s.
A bit better, but there’s still a pattern with the 0s, in that there is always an even number of digits between them. And this is still a monoalphabetic cipher, barely a step above the Polybius cipher once you figure out that 0 = space (not a difficult conclusion to make). So, let’s add Fibonacci:
Cool. Now there’s no pattern between 0’s at all. This even acts as a bit of a salt, although it’s not an actual salt. To make it even more devious, we could make it look a bit like a longer md5 hash by adding random letters:
Go for lowercase, to prevent confusion with O and 0. Who decided to make the letter O look just like 0, anyway?
And there you go. To decode it, you first need to remove all the letters. Then write out the Fibonacci sequence. How many digits you need depends on the encoded string - if the first two characters are 12 or less then you probably need one digit more than the length of the string. (Basically, you need the difference to be positive.) Then subtract it, and separate it into words depending on the 0’s, then refer to the pi-code chart to figure out the individual letters.
Give it a try - how would you decode this?
Implementation in Python
- If you remember pi and are good with arithmetic, then it’s pretty simple
- Difficult to decode unless you already know how it works
- Can’t do letter-based frequency analysis, or even word-based if you use 0 for spaces and then use Fibonacci as a salt
- Lots of different ways to go about implementing it (see alternatives)
- No easy way of implementing punctuation or numbers in a consistent manner, unless you want to use more digits of pi (which could get messy) or do something with zeros
- Decoding by hand is messy, time-consuming and easy to do incorrectly
- Words starting with the same sequence of characters will look similar (unless you use reverse Fibonacci)
- Instead of using pi, use some other sort of substitution cipher - any that involves numbers would work
- Or, add an extra layer - caesar cipher or reverse cipher it first
- Start numbering at 0 instead of 1 (although you’d have to do spaces differently), or even number backwards (9876 etc)
- Add Fibonacci in the other direction (i.e. reverse the sequence - try running the Python script with the -r or –reverse flag)
- Using something other than Fibonacci for the salt - say, powers of 2 (although that has the disadvantage of always being even) or powers of 3 (you probably wouldn’t want powers of 1)
- Converting the numbers to letters, somehow, and sprinkling in random numbers for extra deviousness
- Using an actually secure form of encryption